Menu
When a business needs new talent, it has two primary paths to choose from: hiring directly through your in-house team or partnering with a staffing agency to find the right candidates. Which approach is best depends on the specific needs and goals of the organization. In this article, we’ll explore both hiring approaches in detail to uncover which one is the most effective solution for a business need.
Direct hiring refers to the process by which a company directly recruits and employs a candidate for a specific position within their organization, without relying on an outsourced employment agency to manage the hiring or employment relationship. This type of hiring typically involves long-term employment or permanent positions. Companies often prefer direct hiring for roles that:
The direct hiring process involves several structured steps to identify, attract, evaluate, and onboard a candidate for a long-term or permanent role within a company. Here’s an overview of the key stages.
First a business must analyze the job and define the role clearly. This involves outlining the specific responsibilities, required skills, qualifications, and the level of experience necessary for success. Employers also set hiring goals, such as timelines for filling the position, and prioritize the most critical aspects of the role. During this stage, the company establishes the compensation package, including salary, benefits, and any additional perks, ensuring they align with industry standards and the organization’s budget. With this information, the business will then launch a job posting where they can receive applications for the position.
After the job posting is live, sourcing candidates becomes the focus. Employers often begin by reviewing their internal talent pool, considering current employees or previous applicants who may be a good fit. External recruitment efforts include reviewing incoming applications or headhunting through networking events and professional platforms. Once enough candidates are identified, resumes are screened to create a shortlist of those who closely match the job requirements.
Here are some of the most common places that businesses can find talent:
The screening process usually starts with an initial phone or video interview to assess a candidate’s basic qualifications, experience, and interest in the role. Depending on the position, candidates may also be asked to complete skill assessments or technical tasks. Following this, the interview process begins, typically with a first round focused on technical skills and job-specific knowledge. Final interviews often involve assessing the candidate’s cultural fit, problem-solving abilities, and interpersonal skills, with input from team members or leadership.
Before making an offer, the employer may conduct background and reference checks to verify the candidate’s qualifications, employment history, and professional references. Depending on the role and industry, additional checks, such as criminal background screenings, credit checks, or drug testing, may also be required.
Once a suitable candidate is identified, the company extends a formal job offer, usually in writing. The offer includes details about salary, benefits, start date, and other terms of employment. Candidates may negotiate certain terms, such as salary or vacation time, before accepting the offer. After reaching an agreement, the company finalizes the offer with an employment contract or onboarding agreement to confirm the candidate’s acceptance.
The final step in the direct hiring process is onboarding. Before the candidate’s first day, the company provides an onboarding plan, which may include training schedules, access to company resources, and necessary paperwork. On the first day, the new hire is welcomed, introduced to the team, and given an overview of company policies, culture, and expectations. Ongoing training and support ensure the candidate transitions smoothly into their role and becomes a productive member of the organization.
Direct hiring has both advantages and disadvantages depending on the company’s needs, goals, and the specific role being filled. Here’s a breakdown of the pros and cons:
Pros of Direct Hiring
Cons of Direct Hiring
Staffing agency hiring occurs when a company partners with a staffing agency to recruit and employ candidates for specific positions. In this model, the staffing agency typically manages the recruitment process, including sourcing, screening, and onboarding. Depending on the agreement, the candidate may work as an employee of the agency or transition to become a direct hire of the company after a trial period. Companies often rely on staffing agencies for roles that:
The staffing agency hiring process involves collaboration between the agency and the company to identify the right candidates for open positions. Here’s a breakdown of the typical process:
The process begins with the company discussing its hiring needs with the staffing agency. During this consultation, the company outlines the job requirements, qualifications, and the number of roles to be filled. The agency then develops a recruitment plan tailored to the company’s needs, considering factors such as industry, location, and urgency.
The staffing agency takes full responsibility for sourcing potential candidates. Using their existing talent pool, job boards, industry connections, and recruitment networks, they identify suitable applicants. Many agencies maintain a robust database of pre-vetted candidates, enabling them to quickly fill positions.
Once a pool of candidates is identified, the agency begins the screening process. This includes reviewing resumes, conducting preliminary interviews, and performing skill assessments. The agency ensures the candidates meet the job requirements and match the company’s culture. The top candidates are presented to the hiring company, which may conduct final interviews or make the hiring decision based on the agency’s recommendations.
Staffing agencies often handle background checks, including criminal history, credit checks, and reference verification, as part of their screening process. This saves the company time and ensures that only qualified and credible candidates are forwarded.
Once the company selects a candidate, the staffing agency handles the offer process. For temporary or contract roles, the candidate remains an employee of the staffing agency, which manages payroll, benefits, and compliance. In the case of temp-to-hire arrangements, the company can later transition the candidate to a permanent role after an agreed-upon period.
Staffing agencies provide ongoing support after placement, ensuring that both the employer and the employee are satisfied. If issues arise, the agency can step in to resolve them or replace the candidate if needed.
Pros of Working With A Staffing Agency
Cons of Staffing Agency Hiring
When evaluating the costs associated with direct hiring versus utilizing staffing agencies, it’s essential to consider both direct and indirect expenses. Below is a detailed comparison:
| Cost | Direct Hiring | Staffing Agency |
|---|---|---|
|
Recruitment Advertising
|
Expenses for job postings on platforms like Indeed, LinkedIn, and industry-specific sites. Costs can vary widely depending on the role and duration of the posting. |
Typically included in the agency's fees, reducing the need for separate advertising expenditures. |
|
Time-to-Fill
|
The duration to fill a position can be longer, leading to potential productivity losses. Extended vacancies may impact team performance and project timelines. |
Agencies often have a pool of pre-screened candidates, potentially reducing time-to-fill and minimizing productivity losses. |
|
Cost Per Hire
|
According to the Society for Human Resource Management (SHRM), the average cost per hire is nearly $4,700. |
Staffing agencies typically charge a placement fee, often a percentage of the candidate's first-year salary. The median fee is around 20%. |
|
Training and Onboarding
|
Direct hires may require comprehensive onboarding and training programs, incurring additional costs. This includes orientation sessions, training materials, and mentorship programs. |
Agencies may provide candidates with preliminary training, potentially reducing the client's onboarding expenses. However, role-specific training may still be necessary.
|
|
Employee Benefits and Taxes
|
Employers are responsible for benefits (health insurance, retirement plans) and employment taxes, which can add approximately 20-30% to the base salary. This includes contributions to Social Security, Medicare, and unemployment insurance.
|
For temporary placements, the agency often covers benefits and taxes. For permanent placements, these costs transfer to the employer after a specified period or upon direct hire.
|
|
Turnover and Replacement Costs
|
High turnover can lead to repeated hiring costs, including recruitment, training, and lost productivity. The total expenses can rise to three to four times the position’s salary when considering indirect costs like productivity loss and extended time-to-fill periods. |
Agencies may offer guarantees or free replacements within a certain timeframe, potentially mitigating some replacement costs. However, reliance on temporary staff can lead to continuity challenges.
|
|
Opportunity Costs
|
Time spent on recruitment detracts from other strategic HR initiatives, potentially impacting overall organizational effectiveness. This includes delays in project execution and missed business opportunities.
|
Outsourcing recruitment allows internal teams to focus on core business functions, potentially enhancing productivity and strategic focus.
|
The decision to use direct hiring or a staffing agency depends on a company’s specific needs, goals, and the nature of the roles being filled. Each approach has unique advantages and drawbacks, and understanding the ideal scenarios for each can help businesses make the right choice.
Large Corporations with In-House HR Teams
Startups and Small Businesses
Companies Focused on Employer Branding
Companies Seeking Long-Term Commitments
Companies with High Turnover or Seasonal Needs
Specialized or Niche Roles
Companies Lacking Internal HR Resources
Temporary or Contract-Based Hiring
Your Business Only Needs Long-Term Roles Filled
Direct hiring is ideal for positions that require long-term stability and continuity. These roles often demand a significant investment in training and onboarding, making it essential to hire employees who are fully committed to the company’s vision. Permanent employment fosters loyalty and ensures a sense of ownership in the role.
You Are Looking To Hire Specialized or Senior-Level Positions
When recruiting for roles that demand advanced expertise, leadership capabilities, or industry-specific knowledge, direct hiring offers the necessary control over the process. Companies can take the time to carefully vet candidates and select individuals whose skills and experiences align perfectly with strategic goals.
You Have Strong Brand Reception
Organizations with strong employer branding or an attractive workplace culture can capitalize on direct hiring to attract top-tier talent. Candidates are more likely to seek out these companies for permanent positions, drawn by their reputation and commitment to employee satisfaction and growth.
You Want Complete Recruitment Oversight
Direct hiring allows businesses to manage the entire recruitment process, from candidate sourcing to onboarding. This ensures greater alignment between the candidate’s qualifications and the company’s long-term objectives. It also provides opportunities to assess candidates holistically for technical skills, cultural fit, and growth potential.
You’re Looking To Build Employee Loyalty
Directly hired employees often feel more invested in the company, as they are part of the organization from day one and receive full benefits. This sense of belonging fosters higher engagement, better performance, and improved retention rates compared to temporary or outsourced workers.
Temporary or Seasonal Workforce Needs Are High
For businesses experiencing fluctuating demand, such as seasonal spikes or short-term projects, staffing agencies offer a flexible solution. Agencies can quickly provide skilled workers who are ready to hit the ground running, without requiring long-term commitments from the company.
You’re In An Urgent Hiring Situation
When speed is critical, staffing agencies excel at quickly sourcing candidates from their pre-vetted talent pools. This approach significantly reduces the time-to-hire, ensuring minimal disruptions to operations when unexpected vacancies arise.
You Have Limited Internal Resources
Companies without dedicated HR teams or with constrained recruitment budgets can rely on staffing agencies to handle the entire hiring process. From sourcing and screening to onboarding, agencies free up internal resources while ensuring the positions are filled efficiently.
You Need Access to Niche Expertise
Staffing agencies specializing in specific industries or roles provide access to highly qualified candidates in competitive fields. Whether it’s tech, healthcare, or manufacturing, these agencies have the networks and expertise to find talent that might otherwise be difficult to reach.
Your Business Is Looking For Temp-to-Hire Arrangements
For businesses uncertain about committing to a candidate, temp-to-hire options offer a practical trial period. Companies can evaluate the candidate’s performance, skills, and cultural fit on the job before extending a permanent offer, reducing the risk of a bad hire.
While direct hiring and staffing agencies each have their unique advantages, businesses don’t have to choose just one. A hybrid hiring approach—leveraging both direct hiring and staffing agencies—can create a flexible, cost-effective, and efficient recruitment strategy that adapts to different hiring needs.
A hybrid hiring strategy allows companies to balance long-term workforce planning with immediate staffing needs. Here’s how businesses can effectively integrate both hiring approaches:
Use Direct Hiring for Core, Long-Term Roles
Use Staffing Agencies for Flexible Workforce Needs
Consider a hybrid hiring approach if your company:
To evaluate the effectiveness of your hiring strategies, whether through direct hiring or staffing agencies, consider monitoring the following key performance indicators (KPIs):
Monitoring these metrics provides valuable insights into the efficiency and effectiveness of your hiring practices, enabling data-driven decisions to enhance recruitment strategies.
If you’re looking for a staffing partner that truly understands your needs, Starboard is the right choice. We take the time to learn about your unique challenges and connect you with candidates who are the perfect fit for your team. Whether you require temporary staff, a reliable seasonal workforce, or full-time hires, we’re here to make the process seamless. If managing recruitment in-house feels overwhelming, let us step in to provide the support and expertise you deserve.
Using a staffing agency can be a valuable investment for many businesses, depending on their hiring needs, resources, and goals. While it comes with costs, the benefits often outweigh the expenses, especially in certain scenarios.
Direct hiring involves the company managing the entire recruitment process, bringing candidates on board as permanent employees with full benefits and direct oversight. In contrast, using a staffing agency outsources the recruitment process to an external partner, who sources, screens, and sometimes employs candidates, often for temporary, seasonal, or temp-to-hire roles.
Yes, companies across various industries continue to rely on staffing agencies to streamline hiring, fill urgent roles, and reduce recruitment costs. It’s reported that over 90% of businesses use staffing agencies in some capacity.
Employers use staffing agencies to save time, access specialized expertise, and gain flexibility in managing their workforce. Staffing agencies handle the recruitment process, from sourcing to onboarding, allowing businesses to focus on core operations.
The cost of using a staffing agency depends on the type of hire, industry, and contract terms. For temporary and contract employees, businesses typically pay a markup fee (anywhere from 20% to 75% of the employee’s hourly wage) covering recruitment, payroll, benefits, and compliance. Direct hire placements often require a one-time fee (usually 10% to 20% of the new hire’s first-year salary). While this may seem like an upfront investment, staffing agencies save businesses money in recruitment time, onboarding, and turnover costs.
816-659-1544 | [email protected] | 16100 W 116th St, Lenexa, KS 66219